85.95%

Two exams, two pass thresholds

The exams used different pass thresholds in 2026, so the rates are not a like-for-like performance comparison.

Published pass rates against the threshold each exam was marked to.

Part I and Part II are not the same result

The Part-I gazette reports one year of papers. The Part-II gazette reports the cumulative certificate, so its totals and grades cover both years together.

Published pass rates for both HSSC gazettes, with the candidates each covers.

The published totals have their own shape

Mean, median and the middle half of the distribution, taken from every listing row that carries a numeric total.

Derived from the published listing.

How the successful results are shaped

Published grade counts show the shape of the pass, not only its size.

Published grade counts.

Six groups sit on very different parts of the scale

Pre-Medical, Pre-Engineering, Science General, Humanities, Commerce and Pre-Home Economics are marked on the same certificate total but arrive at it differently.

Where each group's totals actually land

Pass rates, GPA and grade counts are published. Mark distributions are derived from the listing.

The gender gap is not the same in every group

Girls and boys are compared inside each group, so a group’s overall rate never hides the split.

Published regular and ex/private records, split by group and gender.

Subjects ranked by pass rate

Subjects with at least 1,000 appearances are ranked separately so small entries are not presented as comparable.

Pass rate, lowest first

Published subject totals.

How many subjects candidates carry forward

The load table counts candidates by how many subjects they must repeat; the second view names the subjects themselves.

Failure-load totals and subject-code detail.

Girls lead the published regular science pass rate

Paired rates are shown within each group.

Published regular records, split by group and gender.

Science and Humanities differ in both scale and pass rate

Candidate counts stay beside each rate so groups of very different sizes are not read as equals.

Published regular candidate totals by group.

Regular and ex-private candidates form the largest divide

Enrolled, appeared and passed counts remain visible beside the pass-rate comparison.

Published candidate-type totals.

Results by area

Participation is mapped with accent shades; select a region to inspect it. The rate comparison stays below the map.

Pass rate, with the all-areas reference

Published area totals, including the all-areas reference.

Institutions

Rankings include only institutions with enough candidates to compare. Every row shows its middle 50% marks range.

Mean marks with the middle 50% range

Compare one institution with the board

Minimum 30 candidates to rank; 10 to show a spread.

Institutions specialise

The same institution can sit near the top of one group and mid-table in another, so the ranking is taken one group at a time.

Derived from listing totals within each group. Minimum 30 scored candidates in that group.

Official position holders

Only the official position-holder list is shown, grouped exactly as published.

Official position holders. Roll numbers are intentionally omitted.

The top of the table is tightly packed

Landmark ranks are shown with the marks that reached them, preserving ties.

Derived from published numeric totals, preserving ties.

Near misses at every grade boundary

Counts show one, three and five marks below each published grade boundary.

Derived from listing totals against the published grade scheme.

Some totals occur far more often than their neighbours

The raw one-mark line is unsmoothed. Five values are flagged where their counts stand furthest above immediate neighbours.

Observed pattern across published numeric totals. This is not a claim about moderation.